Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ops and Tactics
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Ops and Tactics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While the article is (now) very long, none of the information can in fact be verified using reliable sources. PROD was removed by the IP adding the text. It's clear that a lot of work has gone into the article and the product itself but all my tries to find even a single reliable source failed. As such, the subject fails WP:NPRODUCT and WP:GNG. Regards SoWhy 10:03, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. SoWhy 10:03, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Lacks notability. No reliable, independent external sources. It's extremely niche. As SoWhy said, lots of effort has been put into the article, but it just lacks notability I'm afraid.FirefoxLSD (talk) 14:51, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete what little is left of this. Not much left. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:05, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.