Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organic ambient music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to ambient music. Stifle (talk) 15:40, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Organic ambient music

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another neologism, No real description of the music a lot of "tends to" Nos real description of style, or development history. I would remove the Brian Eno statement but that would be bad form since I'm nominating this for deletion. Ridernyc (talk) 10:59, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete even though there is a hint of coverage. There is, in fact, a statement by Brian Eno on the term, here, but I doubt he intends to make a claim about a "real" musical genre. I found two other statements in reliable sources, here and here, but given that those references are 15 and 7 years old that's not enough to establish notability as a genre. Drmies (talk) 23:19, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to ambient music. Eno's quote does seem to identify it as a subgenre of ambient, but it's a passing mention. The article in SF Weekly appears to be using "organic" adjectivally, not as part of a set term "organic ambient", and it's unclear how Miami Music is using it (again in passing, in an article on minimal techno; BTW, looks like that article is cited in minimal techno, so I added the link). Doesn't look like there's anything salvageable to merge. It'd be best covered under the auspices of the parent genre. — Gwalla | Talk 19:10, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to ambient music per Gwalla. Jujutacular ^T · C 07:30, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.