Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oro Blanco
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep DavidLeighEllis (talk) 20:30, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oro Blanco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was created by the sockmaster User:Edson Rosa. They have created many non-notable companies. This article has no sources establishing notability and I could find no substantial coverage establishing notability. I recognize that language could be an issue in establishing notability, so if this company is regionally, perhaps someone can find an independent reliable source. I am One of Many (talk) 18:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 23:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 00:00, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Large publicly traded company. A merge of some sort to the article on its subsidiary or into an article on its primary stakeholder seems worth considering. Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:53, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This is a large company however, not huge but still notable. The article needs merging or expanding, seen as the figures are old too. Adrianw9 (talk) 16:23, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.