Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orzu Iso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. After reviewing the sources, I am convinced the subject meets our notability guidelines for inclusion.

Thanks everyone for participating. Unhappy with this decision? If one wishes to renominate this article with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. I will not re-review my decision. Happy holidays. Missvain (talk) 00:37, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orzu Iso

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person; fails both GNG and ANYBIO. Htanaungg (talk) 06:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Htanaungg (talk) 06:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Htanaungg (talk) 06:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tajikistan-related deletion discussions. Htanaungg (talk) 06:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:21, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment copy-edited to streamline, but haven't checked coverage. Lajmmoore (talk) 08:36, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:58, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep My Russian from 30 years ago is really hazy but I see no reason why References 1 and 5 at least do not constitute significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Some time with Google Translate leads me to the same conclusion as the user above. I would re-write the article though. 80.247.89.52 (talk) 17:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editor is a new WP:SPA who has made only 8 edits to Wikipedia. scope_creep^Talk 20:53, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.