Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ouachita Hills Academy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ouachita Hills Academy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

i do not believe that Ouachita Hills Academy is notable also this article is promotional of the school as this article violates NPOV wikipedia is not an advocacy platform also there are zero citations so you cannot verify the claims of this article Jonnymoon96 (talk) 01:56, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Guidelines unclear. My searches using the "find sources" links turned up virtually no independent coverage. Per NSCHOOLS, this article must have received significant coverage in reliable, independent sources to be retained, and that would ordinarily settle the matter.
However, the 2017 schools RFC instructs: "Because extant secondary schools often have reliable sources that are concentrated in print and/or local media, a deeper search than normal is needed to attempt to find these sources. At minimum, this search should include some local print media." I don't have the resources to dig through local sources, so am I prohibited from voting "delete" here? Or does the RFC require only that someone in the discussion perform the search before the discussion can close in favor of deletion? Or is the close merely exhorting us to perform local searches, not mandating it? Rebb ing 23:19, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I searched Nexis and couldn't find substantial coverage in local news, Rebbing. I would have thought most US local newspaper content is available online in any case (I think this part of the RfC close refers more to non-Western contexts). Cordless Larry (talk) 12:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Cordless Larry: Oh, duh! Of course it would be available online: if not on the Web directly, at least as scans in a newspaper database. Thank you. Rebb ing 13:12, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing to meet our notability guidelines. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:53, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for my reasons given above and on the basis of Cordless Larry's search. Rebb ing 13:12, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No significant coverage found, even in paid databases. James (^talk/_contribs) 21:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:06, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.