Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. Nathan Toomey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The one 'keep' !vote was dependent on more sources being fond that have not been produced. Just Chilling (talk) 12:56, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

P. Nathan Toomey

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP on a person who once got third-place in a roleplaying game contest. BLP has a four sentence mention in one book published by "Evil Hat Productions" [1]. A standard BEFORE (JSTOR, Google Books, Google News, newspapers.com) fails to find any further references. There is a presumption of privacy for obviously not notable individuals of which this is one; for the benefit of both the subject and WP, this should be deleted. Chetsford (talk) 05:31, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 05:34, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Men-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 05:34, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 05:34, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Is not notable. Willbb234 (talk) 08:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise move to draft so that it can be worked on. BOZ (talk) 11:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In general I'm inclined to support Draftify, however, I think this should be avoided in BLPs except in exceptional circumstances due to our policy that "human dignity and personal privacy be taken into account, especially in articles of ephemeral or marginal interest". Chetsford (talk) 15:23, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I cannot find sources to support notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:10, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.