Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Packer (software) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 16:16, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Packer (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources except self-references and some niche mentions in passing/marketing material. Last AfD ended in no consensus due to nobody bothering to comment. Ping last AfD creator User:WikiPuppies]. Let's delete this spam. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:46, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 13:34, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This software has been mentioned in numerous articles and several books, so it shouldn't be difficult to find reliable sources for it. Jarble (talk) 21:51, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So find it. Linking to Google page and saying that this phrase exists on Google is hardly an argument for anything. WP:BUTITEXISTS is probably the most lame argument you can find at AfD, and WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES is not much better.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:51, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:19, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I am not seeing independent authoritative sources. The references are to packer.io and related sites.--Rpclod (talk) 16:41, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- WP:MANUAL; no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:24, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MANUAL. I'm not seeing much that would demonstrate this software's notability. Reyk _YO! 09:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.