Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistan Institute of Chemical Engineers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan Institute of Chemical Engineers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing significant in my searches. Mentioned in this letter. Fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 19:57, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 20:17, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 20:17, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete it appears to fail meeting WP:ORG because there is no coverage in RS. unless someone demonstrate that this volunteer led body has received some attention or coverage from reliable independent sources, it could be deleted safely. I also would like to point out that there are Institute of Chemical Engineers in several other counties such as Iran, Israel, Korea, Philippines, Japan, Taiwan but they don't have standalone articles on Wikipedia for the reason Existence ≠ Notability. But because this organisation has been named in at least one Letters to newspapers, i may only suggest Weak delete. --Saqib (talk) 07:06, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete such organizations are largely non notable in any country because they only conduct annual meetings and largely are subsets of Science Academies. No sources that can take this to meet WP:ORGDEPTH or even WP:GNG. Even the American one is largely sourced with primary sources feom their website despite American media hegemony but no independent sources. If we go with the template if this article then all other countries can have stub created with one external link of the association which shows existence. –Ammarpad (talk) 07:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.