Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistan International Airlines Flight 606

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 13:36, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan International Airlines Flight 606

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-noteworthy event. WP:NOTNEWS. Lopifalko (talk) 11:13, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Lopifalko (talk) 11:13, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:31, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, hard landings on the runway happen, not notably. Hyperbolick (talk) 13:38, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence that this is particularly noteworthy for an article, just a bad day at the office. MilborneOne (talk) 14:34, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Delete per above, also this event is so non-notable that it probably doesn't even qualify as news. Found nearly nothing when searching for this, not to mention that there is no evidence suggesting that anything more that a rough landing took place.Grapefruit17 (talk) 18:09, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per all above. Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 22:10, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTNEWS....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:07, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As per nom. - MA Javadi (talk) 20:09, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - run of the mill incident. No fatalities. No international sources. Bearian (talk) 21:08, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

*Not Delete - Not delete : As it gives a valid information of the flight that met with an accident.--Kskhh (talk) 09:01, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is showing of real event so don't delete the page — Preceding unsigned comment added by پاک آرمی زندہ باد (talk • contribs) 15:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NOTNEWS, hard landing case that did not cause any death. Such accidents are common and do not deserve an article. WP:AIRCRAFT also has an essay on the notability criteria for WP:AIRCRASH which this article fails. --DBig Xrayᗙ 18:44, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. TC60054 (talk) 22:20, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and close per WP:SNOW.4meter4 (talk) 12:33, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.