Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistan International Airlines Flight 709

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article was speedily deleted by SarahStierch per WP:CSD#G5 (creation of a banned user). Further there is a clear consensus below that the topic is not notable for Wikipedia's purposes and so it would have been deleted regardless of the creator. Thryduulf (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:17, May 30, 2013

Pakistan International Airlines Flight 709

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:AIRCRASH and WP:NOTNEWS also applies

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William 14:08, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William 14:08, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William 14:08, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ...William 14:08, 24 May 2013 (UTC) ...William 14:08, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Minor incident, not notable. WWGB (talk) 14:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, because Wikipedia is not a newspaper.--FoxyOrange (talk) 15:59, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Too soon to create the article and too soon to judge if it should be deleted – creation and AfD were within a couple of hours of the event. I'm sure things will be clearer by the end of the week's discussion. Dricherby (talk) 16:34, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable incident. Nothing happened and will be forgotten about in a week. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable diversion. Mjroots (talk) 19:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:AIRCRASH and WP:NOTNEWS. No fatalities, no serious damage. Nothing outstandingly significant. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:49, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not an actual incident, just the arrest of some unruly passengers upon landing. Hiberniantears (talk) 16:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Family argument blown up out of proportion Fudpukker (talk) 18:51, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A good example of a serious incident that is newsworthy in the short term but is not notable in the long term for an encyclopedia.Crtew (talk) 09:25, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most probably a sockpupet of User:Ryan kirkpatrick --Petebutt (talk) 10:27, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable incident, not worthy of an article. - Ahunt (talk) 21:52, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Since this article was deleted yesterday under G5, why is it still in AfD? It seemed like a snowball anyway. So for these reasons the discussion should be closed. Crtew (talk) 09:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.