Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamoja Mtaani
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. –Juliancolton Happy Holidays 14:26, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Pamoja Mtaani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Game with no assertion of notability. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 21:26, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:12, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Week keep: A google search turned up some articles: 1UP.com, The Escapist Magazine, Variety Magazine, and the Time Warner press release. Though most don't say too much. This game looks to be a new development, so there may not be much to info right now. A redirect may be the best solution, though I don't know where to. (Guyinblack25 talk 17:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC))[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 05:00, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief with no prejudice against reversing that redirect if some better sources become available. The problem with these is that they mostly consist of background rather than details on the game itself or consist mostly of direct quotes from WBIE's press release. If that should change into coverage of the game itself further down the line then we have a notable game, but what's here may be it, and there's nothing like enough material to make an article with. Hopefully the sources will appear in the future, but since it can't be predicted a redirect seems best for now. Someoneanother 17:06, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - as Someone suggests. Plenty of Google News hits [1], but seem to be of the press release variety and always in conjunction with PEP/AIDS relief. Marasmusine (talk) 16:43, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.