Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamuk Güllü Yılmaz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pamuk Güllü Yılmaz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For essentially the same reasons as Sude Mihri Çınar, this should be deleted too. The entire article is just a prose version of her Turkish Football Federation stats page. Yılmaz's career in WP:NOTFPL leagues and at youth level do not confer notability. Likewise, her rugby career doesn't reach the heights of WP:NRU. The best sources found in searches, including a Turkish search, are only passing mentions relating to one rugby event at Karsiyaka Haber and Haberler. Passing mentions do not add up to a WP:GNG pass as many recent AfDs have established. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:59, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:03, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom, fails football, rugby union and GNG guidelines. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Without prejudice to change vote to Keep if significant coverage is later found. For my search, I was unable to find WP:SIGCOV for the subject, noting that someone with searching skills for Turkish sources might uncover things I was unable to. Until that point, my vote stands as delete. GauchoDude (talk) 12:29, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails notability criteria. Paul Vaurie (talk) 04:15, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.