Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panyam Vuppu Vanaja Bai
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I JethroBT drop me a line 06:05, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Panyam Vuppu Vanaja Bai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. She appears to have been a local politician of no particular note. Sitush (talk) 21:54, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: no RS found in my search results. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 22:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Weak delete
keep: Looks like she is a state-level politician, not a local level one. If so, I think NPOL applies, as we most certainly keep articles on US State-level politicians.Willing to reconsider my position upon further discussion. Montanabw(talk) 21:03, 29 July 2016 (UTC) Change to delete per Sitush. Montanabw(talk) 22:22, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Montanabw: No. She was at best a politician in her town. She was never elected to the state assembly, nor have I even found evidence that she stood for it, despite the misleading "Panyam constituency" mention. - Sitush (talk) 22:14, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.