Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parsa Khaef

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G5 (created by blocked user in violation of block). The Keep comments below all come from people who are almost certainly sockpuppets or meatpuppets. Hut 8.5 18:34, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Parsa Khaef

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable musical artist. fails WP:GNG. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:46, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep My friend, many sources have been mentioned and are still available, but I did not add them because it seemed to be enough. But if you think they are not enough, I will add. Because deleting this article is cruel despite all the sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliasghar ghorbandokhtt (talk • contribs) 12:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Put a little rigor aside because this article is too valid and deleting it may not be fair — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliasghar ghorbandokhtt (talk • contribs) 12:51, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Struck duplicate.--- Possibly (talk) 15:06, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article does not speak for itself as to either general notability or musical notability. The article has already been moved to draft space once and re-created in article space, either tendentiously or to game the system. The article has reference-bombed, and an article on a run-of-the-mill subject with 27 sources is still an article on a run-of-the-mill subject. Robert McClenon (talk) 12:58, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ How long will this discussion last and will you help me improve it instead of deleting the article? I will give you whatever you want — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliasghar ghorbandokhtt (talk • contribs) 13:02, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

struck duplicate !vote.--- Possibly (talk) 15:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and Robert McClenon. Also, to the article creator, you can only really recommend once, and putting "Keep" three times means nothing (this isn't a vote). AdoTang (talk) 13:16, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In my opinion this paper is qualified enough to be in wikipedia.it's valid and it's about a well known Musical artist! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.70.28.92 (talk) 13:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think we needed a wiki page about ParsaKhaef. I liked the context and i found the informations interesting.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.210.248.40 (talk • contribs)

Keep I just wanna say Parsa Khaef is a profeesional Singer and I see the lack of a page about him in wikipedia https://www.pishkhan.com/news/166284 https://www.tabnak.ir/fa/amp/news/942377 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.55.98.1 (talk) 13:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've been following Parsa Khaef works for a while and I can tell you he is such a genious. He'll be much more famous in one year or two and that's why I think wikipedia should have make a page for him — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.51.43.94 (talk • contribs)

Keep I wanted to earn some information about Parsa Khaef, so I took a look at wikipedia and unblievably there was none. This guy is so bold and wikipedia need a page about him — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.2.225.10 (talk) 14:15, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I wish the kid luck as he embarks on a career in which he can utilize his talents. But to all the puppets or friends above, Wikipedia is an encyclopedic resource in which people and things must qualify for inclusion. This is not a promotional service that simply extends a musician's social media blitz. He has some introductions and announcements online, but none meet Wikipedia's crucial requirements for reliability and significance. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:17, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I wanted to earn some information about Parsa Khaef, so I took a look at wikipedia and unblievably there was none. This guy is so bold and wikipedia need a page about him — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.122.130.202 (talk) 14:27, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The artist has been mentioned in native language news sources and TVs, which means he is notable, and he's been in the Persian and Turkish music market ten years before he joined the Asre Jadid, that's why I think it's better to keep his article.

Keep As you can see, Parsa Khaef is a Persian singer, and unfortunately, there is no copyright law in Iran. That’s why the most reliable source on the Persian music market is Radio Javan. Please do research, and you’ll see it’s true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.251.212.211 (talk) 14:38, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment it’s fascinating how the same points are made over and over again at AfDs about Iranian singers. “There’s no copyright” etc. I’m just waiting for “There’s censorship so sources are hard to find.” Woeful. Mccapra (talk) 14:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an outstanding example: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ava Bahram (2nd nomination). ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:08, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete GNG fail. All the socks adding k*ep !votes are likely the same person, as they make the same weird formatting error when !voting. Also, they are kinda obvious.--- Possibly (talk) 15:15, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This promotional article does not pass WP notability requirements to meet WP:GNG nor WP:MUSICBIO. It does not matter how "talented" or how "much more famous he will be in one year" it is WP:TOOSOON. The sockpuppet votes only harm the credibility of the article and artist, so please stop it as the duplicate votes are completely transparent to us. Netherzone (talk) 16:05, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This should stay because it has the right structure. And I personally vote for its sustainability and I believe it has the authority to remain on Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.34.221.51 (talk) 17:32, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:G5 - see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aliasghar ghorbandokht Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:12, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are we sure user Aliasghar ghorbandokht and Aliasghar ghorbandokhtt are connected? OK seriously now, this is about the most obvious socking at AFD I have seen so far. The AfD is now semi-protected, so tat least the bogus IP !votes will stop. --- Possibly (talk) 18:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.