Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Party In Backyard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:43, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Party In Backyard

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Declined PROD and previously speedied at PartyInBackground. wumbolo ^^^ 22:20, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:16, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:16, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:16, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources are in the article. Nixinova T C 23:34, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 03:27, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this is an entirely non-notable person. Attempts to make it seem otherwise rely on youtube hits for Pewdiepie videos, rather than the subject of the article. Furthermore, whilst an attempt has been made to make it seem well referenced, no references support notability or indeed discuss the subject directly to support this. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:28, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Move to draftspace for improvement and sourcing. AwesumIndustrys (talk) 17:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Easy WP:BLP1E. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 19:24, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. He is a ghost is material RS. When will the penny drop as to the disconnent with people with "millions" of youtube hits who don't even get a mention in the media-obsessed tier 2 papers? Is it because the hits are fake.? Britishfinance (talk) 20:41, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.