Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pathebada
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Eluru. MBisanz talk 01:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Pathebada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. A normal residential area within a city. —usernamekiran(talk) 14:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 15:15, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:36, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:36, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- an unremarkable neighbourhood; not an administrative district. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:32, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- Merge -- Merge with Eluru city article.—IM3847 (talk) 08:07, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Comment: IM3847 is the original creator of this article, I think his opinion should be considered. —usernamekiran(talk) 11:34, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Merge and Redirect to Eluru where it can be mentioned as a neighborhood of the city. Without sufficient independent notability, neighborhoods are covered in the larger area MB 17:41, 3 June 2017 (UTC).
- Comment – According to the latest census of India, the above place is a slum with a population of 875, as one can verify from the page no. 858 of this district census handbook, which was published by the government of India. I guess this report also listed it as a slum. - NitinMlk (talk) 22:50, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.