Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patric Elder

Patric Elder

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a WP:BLP that was rejected at AfC for a lack of notability. Of additional concern is WP:NPF: half of this article of a BLP is an unsourced "Controversies" section (the only inline source is the IBO academic integrity policy). CMD (talk) 07:52, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Malaysia. CMD (talk) 07:52, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom non notable fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 08:32, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I remove the unsourced "Controveries" section per WP:BLPSOURCE. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 09:03, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Delete - Still fails WP:BIO/WP:GNG - I had declined as a draft. Strangely, they had said they understood and again here the issue, but then decided just to move to main and blank the talk page feedback. KylieTastic (talk) 11:26, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Perceived notability seems to stem from unsourced controversies, now removed. /Julle (talk) 13:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: So he's a drama teacher? Hasn't been convicted of any crimes, so that's not notable. Rather routine career otherwise. I don't see notability. I can't find sourcing about this person either. Oaktree b (talk) 15:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]