Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Eugenia Cárdenas Santa María

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. with WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Patricia Eugenia Cárdenas Santa María

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. And ambassadors are not inherently notable. All the coverage merely confirms that she is ambassador often at the start of her appointment but nothing indepth like achievements or career. LibStar (talk) 14:21, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:10, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:10, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:10, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (cackle) @ 21:34, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I consider that the holders of notable posts such as ambassadorships, from and to major countries at least, are notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:45, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

there is no inherent notability of ambassadors even if they are assigned to major countries. LibStar (talk) 22:11, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:29, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.