Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Taylor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Patricia Taylor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional BLP with no RS-- links are all primary and/or irrelevant. I could not find anything to establish the notability of the subject. The article's existence was challenged in 2007 at User talk:Delicasso#Patricia Taylor, with no reply. Blue Edits (talk) 13:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete She showed up at the Oscars with Keanu Reeves, she's his mother? I don't see much we can salvage. I didn't find any reviews of her books. Oaktree b (talk) 13:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After some cursory Googling, Keanu Reeves' mother appears to be an English costume designer, so probably a different person entirely. Blue Edits (talk) 14:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Un unremarkable name like this hinders searching, but I couldn't see anything & certainly the sources are less than convincing, to put it kindly.TheLongTone (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Women, and Sexuality and gender. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:35, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not finding significant coverage in reliable sources Mujinga (talk) 21:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete highly promotional article which is inappropriate for Wikipedia. Search in Wikipedia Library turned up many articles in Cosmopolitan like this one from 2010 and at least one similar article in Redbook where she is quoted as a sex educator giving advice, but nothing immediately apparent that looks like SIGCOV about her to merit her own article. Cielquiparle (talk) 17:26, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per those above. Promotional article on a subject who has quoted a handful of times in reliable sources, but not actually received significant coverage themself. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:03, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.