Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul the Venetian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Vanamonde93 (talk) 22:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paul the Venetian

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Paul the Venetian is one of the lesser known Masters in Theosophy. There is a serious lack of reliable sources from academic or historians that have covered Paul the Venetian. All of the sources on the article Bailey, Leabeater, Prophet etc are entirely unreliable. I would say per lack of independent reliable sources this article is not notable and should be deleted. Psychologist Guy (talk) 22:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:55, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Unlike other Theosophy-related topics recently nominated for deletion (Master Hilarion, Lucifer, Coulomb Affair), for this topic I found no reliable independent sources that treat the subject in depth. Without such sources, we cannot write an article that adheres to Wikipedia's policies of neutrality and verifiability. Jfire (talk) 00:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this due to WP:SIGCOV. All of the sources are in-universe books and materials, none of which are either independent or reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 18:22, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.