Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paula Stone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:05, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paula Stone

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable actress. Only 14 film credits to her name, mostly in small roles, once in a voice role on a TV episode. Doesn't meet threshold for notability, and we can't say it's because it is too soon. Quis separabit? 17:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - Very close on WP:NACTOR, as she was the female lead in Hop-Along Cassidy, and the multi-year host of a show on the Mutual Radio Network (information I just found and added). --| Uncle Milty | talk | 17:55, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. | Uncle Milty | talk | 18:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has had prominent roles in eight films, including the lead in two. The references in the article are very good, with 12 articles by The New York Times, one by Nevada State Journal and one by Long Beach Press, they are offline- but that makes no difference in view of wikipedia's good faith guidelines. I think WP:BASIC is passed .Atlantic306 (talk) 01:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think there's just enought to pass Nactor. Could do with a bit of work, but definitely worth keepping. Cindlevet (talk) 19:39, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.