Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peerless Network, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Move to Draftspace. Cerebellum (talk) 15:45, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peerless Network, Inc.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional content with no claim of significance. Sources provided are more like press releases —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:50, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:50, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Draftspace: This is simply a new editor who needs help writing an article. No need to delete it when it simply needs to be put in draftspace and rewritten with the help of AfC. — Gestrid (talk) 01:58, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support: I think it needs to be improve, as for the promotional tune and links, I have fixed that. --Music Boy50 (talk) 14:00, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Blocked sock. MER-C 04:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Draft & tag for AfC The company sounds as though it ought to be notable. The author requested and received advice about the article but has not acted on it. I fear that the end result of this will be a WP:G13 in 6 months time. Cabayi (talk) 13:37, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
'~~Support~~ Keep: I originally posted the article. I sought advice and assistance and received it in the form of correction to reference format and edits to content. In response to comments above, edits were made by myself and other editors (MusicBoy) to all objections. The company has made significant contributions to the telecommunications industry - specifically in the way that disparate networks communication, and carries traffic for all major wireless and wireline US carriers - therefore meeting the notability threshold. I do believe that the company will continue to offer innovation to its industry, and thus content will continue to be added, and the article won't be abandoned as suggested above. Jlk0221 (talk) 15:47, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Jlk0221 (talk) 14:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.