Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peller (comedian)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. I don't see a consensus here. Thank you for putting together the source assessment table. I encourage editors to improve the article so it doesn't make a return trip for a 2nd AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 23:45, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Peller (comedian) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A Stub-class assessed article, Not notable to be on mainspace, from the references provided, article fails WP:SIGCOV, no in-depth information as regards to weather it should be kept on Wikipedia as a stand alone article, there are little references from secondary sources, seams very promotional and I think it should be deleted, all I see is mentions and references about social media “Tiktok” which has nothing to do with Notability on Wikipedia. Getreallycool (talk) 22:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock. Reading Beans 08:32, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 22:51, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 August 13. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:58, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete no SIGCOV. Alexeyevitch(talk) 04:21, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Lack of significant coverage, and that is because the person has not yet achieved any solid achievements. Per Nom, WP:TOOSOON. Nihonjinatny (talk) 07:25, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: The entry passes the general notability guidelines per these sources here.
- Okanlawon, Taiwo (2 June 2024). "Five things you need to know about Peller". PM News. Retrieved 14 August 2024.
- Akinyemi, Femi (17 April 2024). "Peller: Teenage sensation taking digital world by storm". Nigerian Tribune. Retrieved 14 August 2024.
- Okanlawon, Taiwo (30 May 2024). "Meet Peller; TikTok newest sensation". PM News. Retrieved 14 August 2024.
- Alabi, Taiwo (13 February 2024). "The TikTok Titans of Nigeria: Top 5 Creators Making Waves". TheNEWS. Retrieved 14 August 2024.
I want to note that no form of WP:BEFORE was made by this apparently very new user before nominating an article for deletion. There argument that it is a stub article has nothing to do with notability nor does being a TikTok personality prevent one from being notable as noted in their nomination. Best, Reading Beans 07:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: An "aspiring top streamer" per the the Nigerian Tribune source used in the article confirms this is TOOSOON. The rest are "meet the celebrity" articles... For someone taking the world by storm, there is a lack of coverage outside of Nigeria. Only new coverage I can find is that this person bought a Mercedes [1], which is nothing notable. I wish them well, but we're not quite at notability yet. Oaktree b (talk) 18:22, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep. I wouldn't consider all of Reading Beans' sources to be WP:SIGCOV, but this one and this one are and contribute to a bare pass of WP:GNG. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:58, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: After a WP:BEFORE, this does meet GNG. They're multiple sources online that significantly covers the subject. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 19:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further comment on newly found sources would be helpful. By the way, nominator has been blocked as a suspected sockpuppet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)- Second source looks fine, I'm not sure if it's a RS... Still feels TOOSOON. Oaktree b (talk) 00:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- I usually don’t like replying !voters but I don’t think you’re doing any WPBEFORE here. PM News is a national daily newspaper in Nigeria and your stance about the subject being TOOSOON when there are significant in-depth coverage from reliable sources is something I still do not understand and that is because our opinion differs. Anyways, here’s another source from ThisDay—a national daily newspaper too. here. If you want to make a search about him to find more sources, you can use this this. Best, Reading Beans 05:48, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Second source looks fine, I'm not sure if it's a RS... Still feels TOOSOON. Oaktree b (talk) 00:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Per Nom, it’s TOOSOON as Oaktree b said. It seams the page creator has a possible COI, secondly the page creator has other editors who gives him back up, I demand an admin should review the relatable similar contributions between the page creator and most of the user who has edited this page. 105.113.12.201 (talk) 14:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC) — 105.113.12.201 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Weak keep: Article (sources therein) and the ones presented by Reading Beans above meets WP:SIGCOV in both independent sources as well as reliable per WP:NGRS. I am concerned about WP:ENT, which it meets slightly. However, a great WP:STUB is allowed on Wikipedia. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 10:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I am seeing "No SIGCOV" when my Google showed coverage in Nigeria sources, reliable per WP:NGRS. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 10:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: This is a subject has a Similar name to someone on the web that has news coverage but certainly not this TikTok comedian, fails WP:ENT, article isn’t well written to add. 105.120.129.249 (talk) 15:31, 27 August 2024 (UTC)— 105.120.129.249 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still no consensus or specific comments on sources and whether they are adequate. This is more useful than general talk about "sources" without identifying which ones provide SIGCOV.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, having completed a source analysis. Sources given above by commenters are included; sources marked as reliable or unreliable are per WP:NGRS unless otherwise indicated. I found another source which I have included as well.
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
 A list of five facts about Peller in one sentence each; the entire source consists of eight sentences/136 words.
|
✘ No | |
|
|
|
Focused on Peller, good length and detail
|
✔ Yes | |
|
|
|
Another good source focused on Peller
|
✔ Yes | |
|
|
|
Brief coverage of Peller alongside other performers
|
✘ No | |
|
|
|
Short article with not much information
|
✘ No | |
| There is a two-sentence quote from Peller, but I don't believe this is enough to make it non-independent
|
|
In my opinion borderline, but enough to be SIGCOV.
|
✔ Yes | |
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. | ||||
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.