Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peravurani railway station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Railway stations are generally kept if it exists which as proven by the sources below It does..., Consensus is to Keep (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 19:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peravurani railway station

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable geographical location/railway station. A Google image search brings up many unrelated photos, suggesting that the location isn't very notable. Only 10 Google News results. CatcherStorm ^talk 10:23, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The question of how much "inherent notability" attaches to railway stations is yet to be resolved: see comments within the past year here and here. As this station does not seem to come up to general notability criteria, and as we don't seem to have anything about the line this station is on, for the sake of discussion let us propose redirect to Peravurani : Noyster (talk), 19:03, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It's definitely a real rail station.[1]. It's on the line that runs between Karaikudi Junction railway station and Pattukkottai. It's impossible for a rail station not to have extensive government reports, surveys and other historical records, many of which likely aren't in Latin script. While not major, an article of a rail station in the UK or US of this size or smaller would not even be considered for deletion. Unfortunately WP:BIAS is an issue. --Oakshade (talk) 02:22, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Indeed a notable and historic railway station. Some useful content and references have been provided to establish a decent notability. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 15:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. We generally regard all railway stations as being notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.