Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Cavelti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Cavelti

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV scope_creep^Talk 22:55, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not pass notability and reads like a CV. Balle010 (talk) 01:25, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I am inclined to regard the references where his investment advice is referred to, his charity (somewhat primary) and his government board appointments in his field of endeavour all give him notability, independent of the subject as it says on WP:GNG. --Whiteguru (talk) 12:41, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:GNG, WP:TNT, WP:RS, and WP:NOTRESUME. Beside not being notable, at all, this was written obviously by someone who machine-translated a personal statement/resume. Read the lead. The sources are almost all primary sources dependent on the subject. In 2007, we might have forgiven that, but in 2020, everybody know what an encyclopedia is. Bearian (talk) 15:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable person. fails GNG. Priyanjali singh (talk) 08:38, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.