Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Conheim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:38, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Conheim

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Sources are either passing mentions, primary sources, or other Wikipedia articles. Long list of work but WP:NOTINHERITED is in full force here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:59, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:59, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Many source citations and clarifications done, removal of redundant links, Wikipedia circular reference removed, etc. I believe this is a better-sourced page now. Dave Emory (talk) 02:11, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dave Emory: Most of the sources you added are a.) Discogs, which is user submitted and not reliable; b.) Blogspot blogs, also user-created content that is not reliable, or c.) primary sources. Good quality sources should be completely independent of the subject, such as news/journal/magazine/reputable website articles about the subject itself. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I just don't see any reliable source coverage about this subject. The RS's that are cited are articles not about this subject, but simply tangentially mention him...but that's not coverage. Otherwise, as noted, the sources cited are blogs and first person. ShelbyMarion (talk) 18:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.