Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Coombs
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 18:13, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Peter Coombs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm entirely sure if he's fully notable and if this article can be improved as the best results I found were this and this. If kept, this personal-sounding page would need improvement as none has happened since December 2005. Pinging PhilKnight who added the one source. SwisterTwister talk 21:09, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:11, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:11, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:11, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable artist, only ref is a dead link, web searches turn up nothing Kraxler (talk) 19:55, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:52, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:52, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Only ref is a dead link.—Eat me, I'm a red bean (talk · contribs · email) 13:02, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - I can find nothing on the search engines to show this person's notability. Onel5969 TT me 13:13, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.