Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Droege

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:13, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Droege

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP with no references. Appears to be his cv. Rathfelder (talk) 15:11, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:28, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The article identifies him as "Professor and Chairholder at the University of Liechtenstein", so he may pass WP:NACADEMIC Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:30, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not suggesting he isn't notable. But articles about living people have to have references. Rathfelder (talk) 16:51, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I added a reference from a newspaper in Australia. One of his books has been cited by 149 works, and another by 110. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Peter+Droege&btnG= Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:55, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Very happy to withdraw this nomination now. Thank you for your help. I was trying to classify academics by nationality. Do we know if he is a Liechtensteiner? Rathfelder (talk) 19:57, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The article text as it stands is problematic: a promotionally-toned WP:COPYVIO of this page. The problem was introduced by this IP edit in January 2018. It may be appropriate to revert to the earlier version to remove the Copyvio, before commencing to introduce properly referenced text which meets the WP:BLP requirements. AllyD (talk) 20:04, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I suspected something like this. Rathfelder (talk) 21:06, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Trillfendi (talk) 05:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Because of the tenured Eastmain's comments
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes 04:39, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Copyvio removed from page, currently still in history. ^{[Username Needed]} 11:58, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
delete. No refs, no article. Perf115 (talk) 19:10, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG Mgbo120 (talk) 19:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Move it to userspace draft and find more reliable sources. Also, copyedit required. ImmortalWizard(chat) 23:52, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.