Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Testar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:00, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Testar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG - he's an Ordinary Bencher who presides over general crime including fraud cases. The cited sources are not about him but he is mentioned because he happened to be the judge in the case, not that he was notable for it. ^{Atsme📞📧} 02:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 05:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 05:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 05:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:42, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reads like a resume and does nothing to establish notability. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 07:00, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. High Court Judges are notable. Circuit Judges generally are not. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:54, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.