Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petrea Burchard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash^talk 18:54, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Petrea Burchard

This is not an article, this is a minor actress' CV (complete with headshot). And no, clean-up won't make her any more notable. Delete. Calton | Talk 01:41, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per her IMDb page. Notable enough. I'll rework some of it since it reads like vanity/promotion right now. --TM ^(talk) 01:55, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Possible copyvio/vanity. [1] has exactly the same text, and claims that it is "(direct from her via email)". Delete as is but will reconsider after re-write. Cursive 02:00, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll convert it to a short stub. --TM ^(talk) 02:10, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- It's pretty short but the article's history shows numerous editors so it should be expanded by others in the future. --TM ^(talk) 02:19, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ok, now it's not so crufty and blatantly stolen from link above - I like that you've made it into a reference. And she probably passes notability for me. Keep Cursive 02:27, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep she appears to be an actress featured by IMDb, that is notable enough for me. [edit] 02:31, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep - petrea's career is constantly growing i believe and she deserves a spot on this site. i'd hate to see her page go. - hwp
Delete Seems borderline to me. So I'll go for delete to make nom feel happier ;) Marcus22 11:25, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable actress. The last reason given to delete doesn't make much sense, but then again maybe it wasn't meant to be, or what Marcus? Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:46, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The reason for delete is that the actress concerned seems too borderline in my opinion to be included. The last bit is tongue-in-cheek. Marcus22 14:29, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, article has been improved somewhat since it was listed for deletion. Also agree with nominator that she appears to be a minor actress, but in my opinion she is still notable enough to be included amongst the hundreds of other voice actors we document here. Hall Monitor 18:13, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as notable per IMDb. However, I wonder about the copyright status of the image.Hektor 22:04, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: This does seem borderline, but in my opinion tie goes to the article. RENTASTRAWBERRY ^{FOR LET?} röck 22:55, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Bit actress, except for one voice role. Why do people feel mention in IMDb renders an actor notable? IMDb lists everyone who has ever played a role important enough to appear in the movie credits. Denni☯ 02:19, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Exactly, except for one voice role. We have an entire category devoted to voice actors as well as Japanese voice actors. [edit] 17:06, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete TV bit parts and one recurring role as the non-primary voice actor for a character doesn't make her notable, IMO Justin Bacon 06:15, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.