Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phaal
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 23:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Phaal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
unreferenced food stub whose notability cannot be verified. Tavix (talk) 03:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: now referenced. Wheelchair Epidemic (talk) 19:00, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - there are quite a few g-hits for 'Phaal', but I'm not sure if it deserves it's own article. Maybe a merge with Curry (or a subpage thereof)... Looking at Curry just now, it seems that there are quite a few dishes with their own articles, but those articles seem a little more in-depth. So maybe a merge until a more comprehensive article can be written? - Adolphus79 (talk) 03:34, 14 July 2008 (UTC)- Keep - Well referenced and written now, thanks to Wheelchair Epidemic... - Adolphus79 (talk) 22:09, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]Merge per above.JIP | Talk 05:02, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Vote changed to keep now that it has references. JIP | Talk 09:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Added some references and there will be a lot more, phall is famous in the UK (and seemingly also the US now) as the "try it if you dare" curry speciality. Wheelchair Epidemic (talk) 19:00, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, plenty of sources to establish notabilty and encyclopedicity is not in dispute. --Stlemur (talk) 20:40, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Certainly a famous (more accurately notorious) dish in the UK - Wheelchair Epidemic's edits mean that the article is now reasonable, and I'm sure it can be improved further. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 21:38, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep But surely now it's been sourced etc the tag can be removed? Speedboy Salesman (talk) 15:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.