Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pharaoic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The delete camp apart from the numbers has the more tightly argued arguments on the source. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pharaoic

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a "Social Media Star & Entrepreneur" referenced to his own website and spammy PR blogs; see for example [1] we align the next generation of creatives with the right mentors and connections to succeed, [2] His passion for helping people in all aspects of online marketing flows through in the expert industry coverage he provides. Could not find any better sources through WP:BEFORE. Article claims "millions" of followers but he has an unimpressive 70k followers on Instagram and only 68(!) on twitter. Possibly an A7 candidate but since there are "sources" here and a (bogus) claim of significance I thought I would bring it to AFD... SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 09:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 09:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:50, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:50, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How can we improve this Wiki without deleting it? I have gone ahead and updated a lot of the information, what else can be done in order to make this a good article? Please help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnson28.7 (talk • contribs) 10:43, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

From my research, it seems to be that he runs some of his client's accounts, which adds on to his "millions of followers" As I looked through his Instagram page there are huge influencers commenting on his posts. So he is definitely connected in the social media world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnson28.7 (talk • contribs) 10:46, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No sources to establish notability. GirthSummit _(blether) 10:49, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. I can't find any coverage of Pharaoic or Marko Danial in reliable sources to show how he meets WP:BIO. Capewearer (talk) 13:34, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is straight up PR spam about a non-notable individual utilizing blackhat SEO fake sources. Praxidicae (talk) 16:24, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing more than a PR article and borders on WP:G11 territory in terms of promotion. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:17, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Definitely a WP:PROMOTIONAL article, and doubtful whether the subject meets general notability criteria. Patiodweller (talk) 22:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete For reasons stated. Alpateya (talk) 18:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alpateya is a blocked sock. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:34, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think overall there is a good amount of coverage for Pharaoic. Could use a few more sources. But I believe it should be enough for now. The language in the article could be fixed a little better, to fit in with wikipedia's theme. Thanks, (talk) — Note to closing admin: Johnson28.7 (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. — I'm the creator of the article and a fan of the subject. XfD Thanks, (talk)
Delete per nom. I don't see anything approaching notability as Wikipedia defines it. I strongly suspect the OP to have a COI issue here, either an agent or a friend. [Update]: OP added new image, taken by the subject himself. Definitely COI. OP may be even the subject himself under a disguised name. -- Alexf^(talk) 10:46, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I used the image from the subject's site, under creative commons. As I stated before, I am a fan of the subject, but have no relationship with him. Thanks, (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.