Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phi Delta Theta Ohio Iota

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:26, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Phi Delta Theta Ohio Iota

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

doesn't meet the notability requirements of wikipedia NYCRuss ☎ 13:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete. Local chapters of (inter)national organizations should not have their own articles, per WP:ORG. There is nothing in this article that demonstrates an exception should be made. —C.Fred (talk) 14:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Local chapers are not notable. This article fails WP:ORG. -DJSasso (talk) 14:24, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above two. Unless someone produces evidence of specific notability. David V Houston (talk) 16:39, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Dont wish to pile on, but same idea, needs some kinda thing that makes it stand out as notable on its own. Ottawa4ever (talk) 21:06, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:ORG. Lacks the necessary reliable sources. Bridgeplayer (talk) 14:48, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Enigma^msg 22:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.