Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillies Bridge Farm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 12:47, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Phillies Bridge Farm

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couple of hits in some local NY papers, but that's it. This does not pass our notability standards, and is all too promotional to boot. Drmies (talk) 00:32, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:PROMO violation, WP:NCORP and WP:GNG not met. Kirbanzo (talk) 00:38, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:36, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:37, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 01:56, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:12, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 14:33, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per others. Morgan Ginsberg (talk) 23:01, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Series faiure of WP:NORG. Only coverage in news outlets is by advertisments, passing mentions and press releases, and is insufficient to qualify as either in-depth or persistent coverage from independent, secondary reliable sources as required. ——SerialNumber54129 11:56, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.