Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirates of the Caribbean timeline
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. There's clearly a snowball here and the four previous declines at AFC essentially make this a bad faith submission anyway. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:19, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Pirates of the Caribbean timeline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was declined at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pirates of the Caribbean timeline for a good reason multiple times... mabdul 13:39, 16 April 2013 (UTC) mabdul 13:39, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Badly sourced, the synthesis of which together is textbook original research. I don't think you meant to link that AfC submission, since Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pirates of the Caribbean timeline doesn't seem to have been reviewed, let alone declined, and doesn't seem to be in the deletion log. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:48, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. hmssolent\Let's convene My patrols 14:12, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as synthesis of historical events and fictional events. I could see potential in the films being assessed for historically accurate backgrounds, but per the guidelines at WP:FILMHIST, this needs to be done with reliable sources. A timeline approach is not the right approach at all. Erik (talk | contribs) 14:24, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--and he had to go live with it anyway. Then there's the RfA; this editor is hard of hearing. Metaphorically speaking. Drmies (talk) 14:25, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - inappropriate mix of original research and unreliable sources. BencherliteTalk 14:33, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Perhaps there is a wiki devoted to PotC which would welcome such a submission. I encourage the author to find that site, but - as others have said - we do not need this synthesis of history and fiction on Wikipedia. LadyofShalott 15:04, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There is indeed a place for this - at at the Pirates of the Caribbean wiki. bd2412 T 15:50, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per User:BD2412, There's sites for this & it's certainly not here! →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 16:29, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Synthesis of events, and possible original research. ZappaOMati 01:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.