Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixrat.com (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 05:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pixrat.com

Relisting to get a consensus, per nae'blis' "too early to tell. If it is not cleaned up, it may stand for deletion again in the future." Well, now it's the future. Same reasons as given by U911 above: it's a non-notable Web site. See also WP:WEB. Interestingly, Google gives 61,900 hits for "pixrat.com", and 18 hits for "pixrat.com -wikipedia". Wikipedia is not an advertising service!

Delete, non-notable. (relister's vote) --Quuxplusone 03:43, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:WEB, having been mentioned on two semi-notable blogs does not make it notable.--Dacium 03:58, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, clearly non-notable.-Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 04:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:WEB. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 04:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have moved this new deletion discussion to a separate page, per the recommendations at WP:AFD. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 07:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not enough proof of notability. If further references can be provided, I may change my mind, but the references as listed on the page are insufficient. --El on ka 09:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:WEB. Terence Ong 12:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable Computerjoe 's talk 21:40, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.