Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémon Chaos Black
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. — Scientizzle 01:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Pokémon Chaos Black (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Delete This page has no sources, since it's unofficial it shouldn't have article. How do we know if it is being sould worldwide? No external links to prove it. TheBlazikenMaster 13:27, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "Unofficial", "in development". Google returns 708 unique hits, but practically all of these are forum postings, many referring to it being a fake - lots of dodgy Ebay adverts as well. I'd reconsider if there were some reliable sources. EliminatorJR Talk 16:39, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep We just need to rewrite it. Toasty! | Available at your local store 18:42, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Rewrite it then, prove that it's notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. TheBlazikenMaster 18:56, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Are you serious? I would vote for a Speedy Delete, except that hoaxes don't qualify for speedy deletion. There are absolutely no references at all in this article. It sounds like someone just making stuff up. There is no way that Nintendo would release a Pokémon game with a Sonic the Hedgehog character on the box. --Brandon Dilbeck 01:16, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, it exists all right [1]. It's just a fake, though. EliminatorJR Talk 01:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No. Just no. Kwsn(Ni!) 03:47, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- re-merge/redirect this info seems to be almost the whole section from the telefang article... if i remember right, Chaos Black used to redirect there anyways. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 17:24, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- comment actually there used to be a lot of fake pokemon games on ebay. i even had a talk with a lady who had posted a want ad for Jade, i directed her to the official site and here. luckily i think that since then ebay has caught on i haven't seen them anymore. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 17:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- What article? Please provide link. Otherwise the closing admin can't redirect it. TheBlazikenMaster 17:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- comment actually there used to be a lot of fake pokemon games on ebay. i even had a talk with a lady who had posted a want ad for Jade, i directed her to the official site and here. luckily i think that since then ebay has caught on i haven't seen them anymore. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 17:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- section redirect to Keitai Denjū Telefang#Bootlegged versions as the most accurate placement for this to prevent recreation. if someone comes with a RS that discusses Choas Black we can re-redirect it accordingly. -PokeZap (Zappernapper) 19:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- SPEEDY Delete This looks like a G1 in my eyes. FunPika 01:23, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Obviously not a G1 - that's patent nonsense, and not only is the article not patent nonsense, but it's not a hoax either - link again [[2]. That's not to say it shouldn't be deleted through notability though. EliminatorJR Talk 15:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - having played it thru emulation, I can confirm that it is a ROM hack of Pokémon FireRed and LeafGreen, and unofficial. It is not Telefang; rather, it is just a ROM hack of FR/LG. And, actually, that was Pokémon Diamond, Zap. -Jeske (v^_^v) 01:28, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.