Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pol Monen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Noting also that the nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pol Monen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current sources don't pass WP:GNG SpareSeiko (talk) 18:25, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SpareSeiko (talk) 18:25, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - is that including the ones on the Spanish Wikipedia article as well? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:35, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article has been improved. In any case, the AfD is one of several part of a disruptive and indiscriminate edit rampage by a currently blocked blocked sock puppet account with a clear WP:NOTHERE behaviour (see following thread: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1058#"Being held ransom to delete the page unless we pay" comment at AfD).--Asqueladd (talk) 11:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - clearly passes WP:GNG and has two starring roles which is enough to make him notable, in my opinion. User:Asqueladd has demonstrated this. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.