Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Policy reform

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:41, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Policy reform

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not need to be its own page separate page from that of the Global Scenario Group or the Great Transition. It offers little in the ways of actual content that cannot be found and better contextualized on one of the other pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JRC25 (talk • contribs)

Delete: I agree that this does not need to be its own article. This information should be included in articles for sustainability, policy, the Global Scenario Group, or the Great Transition. At the very least, I think we would need to see some reliable secondary sources showing that this concept is notable on its own. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 01:15, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Discussion page was created without afd2 template and never listed in a daily log. Fixed now--no comment on the nomination itself. --Finngall ^talk 16:18, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to Reform, which needs additional content/citations anyway. Policy reform is one of the main usages I can think of for reform (outside of reform schools, I suppose) and I see no reason for it to be a separate article from reform. —Мандичка^YO 😜 19:03, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 19:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮JAaron95 ^Talk 14:57, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 14:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - while the content may be interesting for a college paper, WP is not a collection of essays and personal opinions.--Rpclod (talk) 18:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It does indeed read like a student paper, or a draft of a speech. WP:FORUM. The inline external links go to the Great Transition external website.— Maile (talk) 23:29, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, essay. GregJackP Boomer! 04:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.