Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop Sandbox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Pop Sandbox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability for this company. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Nothing satisfying WP:ORG. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CORP. As far as I can tell, this is a publisher that's published all of TWO books since it was founded. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 10:21, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete only reference is a press release - not sufficient to establish notability for this company. Dialectric (talk) 10:29, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.