Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poppykettle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was deleted already. Woohookitty 08:28, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Correctly listing a VfD nomination originally submitted by JonathanZ. No vote from myself. -- Longhair | Talk 5 July 2005 05:19 (UTC)
- BJAODN. Hilarious nonsense. -- Natalinasmpf 5 July 2005 05:35 (UTC)
- Cleanup to clarify that this is fiction rather than fact; then redirect to The Poppykettle Papers, a little-known book whose contents can surely be summarized in an article devoted to it. Dcarrano July 5, 2005 05:38 (UTC)
- Comment possible copyright violation, as now noted on article page. -- BMIComp (talk) 5 July 2005 06:09 (UTC)
- Delete. Regardless of whether or not this is a copyright violation, it is a verbatim copy of a story written by an author. It is not notable. "Wikipedia articles are not... Mere collections of public domain or other source materials". -- BMIComp (talk) 5 July 2005 06:09 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio. I wondered why one of the Twelve Apostles collapsed off Victoria recently.. those Incan gnomes looking for their brass keys. JamesBurns 5 July 2005 06:11 (UTC)
- Neutral. This is a copyvio, and will be deleted anyway, but the book is notable - and is by a quite notable author. It even has a festival dedicated to it in my hometown, which I remember going to when I was a child. Ambi 5 July 2005 09:37 (UTC)
- Redirect I've created a new, non-copyvio stub at The Poppykettle Papers. Enjoy. -Harmil 5 July 2005 13:43 (UTC)
- I was going to wait until this VfD was over, but, seeing as it is (being a {{copyvio}}), I'm afraid I'm going to nominate that for VfD too. No insult intended, I just don't think the book is worth an article either. You can oppose me here.-Splash 5 July 2005 21:26 (UTC)
- No offense taken. If we had the resources, I'd be all for every new article going up for a vote. -Harmil 7 July 2005 03:04 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.