Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prashant Kanojia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarah-Jane (talk) 15:53, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prashant Kanojia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:BIO or WP:JOURNALIST; all references cited are articles written by him on his blog and news website. Can't find any mention of him online in English or Hindi, apart from on his own websites. This article was speedied twice already by other editors over the last two days, after creation by WP:SPA User:Kanojiaakhbaar. Today it was re-created a third time by WP:SPA User:Jackpd7, who has so far not replied when I asked at the article talk page whether they are two accounts operated by the same person, so it's probably another autobiography. My speedy nomination today was disputed without explanation by a third editor. Norvoid (talk) 13:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - another reference has now been added by User:JDPRADHAN, another WP:SPA account that tried twice to create PRASHANT KANOJIA yesterday. I won't bother with a WP:SPI, as it seems unlikely that this article will survive the AFD. Norvoid (talk) 14:25, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 09:15, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 09:15, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are insufficient references to convince me that the gentleman is notable. I'm amenable to changing my mind if excellence of referencing is added to the article or if it can be shown to me that the article is capable of being referenced with references that meet our criteria for a living person. Fiddle Faddle 15:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's apparently no solid independent notability yet. SwisterTwister talk 06:56, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.