Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preeti Chobey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:15, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Preeti Chobey

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant and non-trivial coverage in reliable sources, other than a binch of name-mentions.Fails our subject-notability guidelines and general notability guidelines.A bunch of the current sources are unreliable and by a mile. ∯WBG^converse 01:15, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 06:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 06:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete functionary of minor parts of a minor party with no significant coverage in reliable sources. Cabayi (talk) 06:23, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Request for clarification. The article doesn't state anything about this in its body text, but it's been categorized in Category:Uttar Pradesh MLAs 2017–22. I don't know nearly enough about Indian politics to know whether this is a badly written article about an incumbent MLA that just needs to be repaired to put the basis for notability where it belongs, or whether the creator just copy-pasted another article as a "template" and failed to remove the irrelevant categories. Can somebody with better Hindi or Urdu language skills than mine verify either way? If she is an MLA, then it's a keep with refimprove because she would pass WP:NPOL #1 — but if she's not, then it's a delete as the position the body text does claim for her is not an "inherently" notable one and the sourcing (comprising glancing namechecks of her existence in coverage of other things, not coverage about her) isn't getting her over WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 18:19, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearcat, she is NOT an incumbent MLA...category removed --Adamstraw99 (talk) 18:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Thanks for the clarification, Adamstraw. Bearcat (talk) 18:31, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete Not a notable politician...office bearer of a 'wing' of a regional party, never an elected representative. --Adamstraw99 (talk) 18:25, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.