Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Press Start (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 20:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Press Start (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely no secondary sources found anywhere. Fails film notability as there are no third party sources anywhere, nor did anyone notable receive a major role (the three bluelinks are minor roles). Only sources are tangential mentions. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 16:52, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Jujutacular ^talk 17:05, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Google search returns no convincing sources to back up notability. —Half Price 18:01, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Yikes. For the nominator to use the term "Absolutely" is a bit of unneccessary hyperbole... specially as searches DO find sources... though such as Micro Film Magazine may not be seen as particularly reliable. But to flatly state there are "absolutely no third party sources anywhere"??? Come on TPH. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:25, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I said no convincing sources. —Half Price 18:10, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:34, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep and clean up the hyperbole. As this one will never be reviewed by The New York Times, I'm okay with a movie that spoofs video game conventions being itself then written about in such video game genre sources as Gamespot,[1] and PC Gamer. [2] Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:44, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:05, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are some secondary sources now (and this actually looks like a movie I wouldn't mind watching). - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 06:25, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.