Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prewriting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete without prejudice to creating an encyclopedic article on this subject. PhilKnight (talk) 18:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prewriting

per WP:NOT#HOWTO KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 16:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Not How To Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 22:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Impossibly bad article, but this is actually a well know pedagogical subject if anyone wants to deal with it properly. There's a good deal of material on its role in language instruction. DGG (talk) 03:05, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jj137 (talk) 23:03, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As DGG writes, it's a fine topic, a quick Google brings up a zillion hits, many from fine universities, so we should have an article - but this isn't it. In fact, I don't think a good article on the topic will incorporate a single sentence from the current article. As Geogre used to write, "de novo". --GRuban (talk) 17:44, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.