Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Christian Oscar of Hanover (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:54, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Christian Oscar of Hanover

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Genealogical entry; see WP:NOTGENEALOGY policy. There is no indication of notability as defined by WP:BASIC and WP:GNG as there is no significant coverage in reliable sources. Wikipedia is not here to chronicle marital and reproductive exploits of obscure princelings. Surtsicna (talk) 13:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Mostly routine genealogical information about someone born after the abolition of nobility in Germany. PatGallacher (talk) 16:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable member of a family deposed from power decades before his birth.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom and the other comments above, non notable person.Smeat75 (talk) 00:36, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This is nothing more than a genealogical record. The topic fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. There are no reliable sources independent of the subject that cover anything directly and indepth about this individual because they have done absolutely nothing notable. Being related to a public figure is not notable WP:INVALIDBIO WP:NOTINHERITED. Wikipedia is WP:NOTGENEALOGY of non-notable members in royal families. // Timothy :: talk 05:06, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per User:Bearian/Standards#Notability_of_Consorts_of_nobility. There's literally nothing he's done outside managing family funds, and some facts can;t be sourced. A redirect to his father's article would also be appropriate. Bearian (talk) 23:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.