Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Mathilde of Saxony (born 1936)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Mathilde of Saxony (born 1936)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not really a princess, born after noble titles abolished in Germany, article is mostly routine genealogy. PatGallacher (talk) 02:37, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:57, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:57, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:57, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, no evidence of individual notability. Oddly enough, the article doesn't even mention her profession and her only real title: it seems she was a medical doctor. —Kusma (t·c) 10:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, no indication of notability. Smeat75 (talk) 14:20, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the section of her father's article that mentions her: Friedrich Christian, Margrave of Meissen#Marriage and children. TJMSmith (talk) 19:29, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and the only coverage is in genealogical publications but Wikipedia is not a genealogy database. 103.200.134.151 (talk) 17:24, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I think the strong and well-argued delete consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Saxon thrones demonstrates that defunct titles are not a claim to notability in themselves. — Charles Stewart (talk) 13:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The article lack substantiality on its own; nothing more than a genealogical record that hasn't even been written properly. TheRedDomitor (talk) 16:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect to her father or husband. I see nothing notable about her. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:40, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete even more deposed monarchy cruft.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.