Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Sura of Parthia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 08:00, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Sura of Parthia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sura of Parthia and List of hoaxes on Wikipedia. World History Encyclopedia seems to have been fooled by this hoax and I know question its reliability. The other sources don't mention a "Sura". Doug Weller talk 07:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Wow I remembered hearing about hoaxes during NPP school, but never thought I would see one pop up like this. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 07:45, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Doug Weller talk 07:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Middle East. Shellwood (talk) 10:37, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete of course, and this title should presumably also be salted to prevent it popping up again. -- asilvering (talk) 14:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Asilvering definitely. Doug Weller talk 09:28, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Agricolae (talk) 16:12, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Dio Cassius says little on the subject. Herodian records the diplomatic negotiations (including as to marriage), but without naming the daughter. The rest of the article is wholly unverified and could be a hoax. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:40, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete like last time. Srnec (talk) 20:51, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.