Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProfMat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be restored if somebody wants to write an article about the Associação de Professores de Matemática. Sandstein 05:36, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ProfMat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find signifciant coverage for this term. Joe Chill (talk) 21:52, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only thing close to a source provided is the external link and that is just an announcement on the website of a sponsering organization. I couldn't find any source that would establish notability using Google either. Rusty Cashman (talk) 22:27, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'd suggest merge to the organization, but they don't have an article. Let's worry about getting the group an article before writing articles about their local terminology which has (per Rusty Cashman) no notability on its own. -Miskaton (talk) 00:02, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no notability here as the lack of sources indicates.--Stormbay (talk) 21:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Rename and edit Agreed about where this should go, but the easiest thing is to use the existing material DGG ( talk ) 00:43, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.