Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Program Executive Office Command Control Communications Tactical

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Aberdeen Proving Ground. Sandstein 09:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Program Executive Office Command Control Communications Tactical

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG/WP:NCORP. Unsourced and no independent sources found. Suggest redirect. Kleuske (talk) 11:27, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - (n.b. target TBD) - While there is plenty of sig-cov on the organisation, both in news and books, it is generally in non-independent sources. In the rare exceptions it fails to meet Sig Cov requirements. I would not be shocked to find some acceptable sourcing, though whether there is sufficient to meet WP:NORG, I'm unsure. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:27, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:24, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:24, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes 16:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (notify) 15:37, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is reasonable, either to its headquarters (Aberdeen Proving Ground) or its parent organization. I slightly prefer APG. --Izno (talk) 20:30, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.